Pay in installments of $7.05 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 4 - Aug 9
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
marble queen pothos scientific name Pothos 'Marble Queen' 6" Pot / NurseryPothos Marble Queen The Stunning, Low Maintenance Showstopper If youre looking for a houseplant that delivers striking variegation with almost no effort, Epipremnum aureum Marble Queen is a perfect choice. This pothos variety is known for its creamy white and green marbled leaves, making it one of the most visually striking members of the pothos family. It thrives in a variety of light conditions, tolerates some neglect, and is an excellent air
Pothos ‘Marble Queen’ – The Stunning, Low-Maintenance Showstopper
If you’re looking for a houseplant that delivers striking variegation with almost no effort, Epipremnum aureum ‘Marble Queen’ is a perfect choice. This pothos variety is known for its creamy white and green marbled leaves, making it one of the most visually striking members of the pothos family. It thrives in a variety of light conditions, tolerates some neglect, and is an excellent air purifier. Whether you’re new to houseplants or have an established collection, ‘Marble Queen’ adds an elegant touch to any space.
What Makes ‘Marble Queen’ Different from Other Pothos?
Pothos plants are known for their adaptability and easygoing nature, but ‘Marble Queen’ stands out with its dramatic variegation. The leaves are heavily streaked with creamy white and green, sometimes appearing almost entirely white. Compared to the classic golden pothos (Epipremnum aureum), ‘Marble Queen’ has a much slower growth rate due to the high amount of white in its foliage—less chlorophyll means less energy for growth.
Another close relative, ‘Snow Queen,’ has even more intense variegation with mostly white leaves, but ‘Marble Queen’ offers the perfect balance of white and green, making it easier to care for while still looking unique.
Why You’ll Love Pothos ‘Marble Queen’ in Your Home
- Gorgeous Variegation – Every leaf is different, creating a stunning marbled effect.
- Thrives in Low Light – While it prefers bright, indirect light, it can handle lower light levels better than most variegated plants.
- Air-Purifying Qualities – Like other pothos varieties, it helps remove toxins like formaldehyde and benzene from indoor air.
- Low-Maintenance & Hard to Kill – Forgives occasional neglect and adapts to a variety of conditions.
- Great for Hanging or Trailing – Works beautifully in hanging baskets, climbing up a moss pole, or trailing from a shelf.
- Easy to Propagate – Snip a cutting, place it in water, and watch new roots form—perfect for sharing with friends.
How to Train & Style Your ‘Marble Queen’
Pothos plants are natural climbers, meaning you can train them in different ways to suit your space:
- Trailing – Let the vines cascade from a hanging basket or shelf for a lush, flowing look.
- Climbing – Attach it to a moss pole or trellis for larger leaves and a more vertical display.
- Bushy Look – Prune regularly to encourage a fuller, more compact shape.
Tip: If your ‘Marble Queen’ gets too leggy, simply cut the vines back. It will grow new leaves from the nodes, creating a fuller plant.
Common Issues & How to Fix Them
Why Are the Leaves Losing Their Variegation?
- Too little light—move the plant to a brighter spot.
- Older growth naturally turns greener, but new leaves should still have strong marbling.
Why Are the Leaves Turning Yellow?
- Overwatering is the most common cause. Let the soil dry out before watering again.
- If the soil is constantly wet, check for root rot and trim off any mushy roots.
Why Are the Leaves Curling?
- Underwatering or very low humidity can cause leaf curling. Increase watering slightly or mist occasionally.
Fun Facts About Pothos ‘Marble Queen’
- It’s native to French Polynesia, where it grows as a climbing vine in tropical forests.
- In the wild, pothos can climb up trees and reach over 40 feet long. Indoors, it usually stays under 10 feet.
- Unlike many houseplants, pothos doesn’t flower indoors—it needs to be in its natural habitat to bloom.
- It’s one of the easiest plants to propagate—just snip a stem, place it in water, and watch roots grow.
Is It Pet-Friendly?
No. Epipremnum aureum is toxic to cats and dogs if ingested. If you have curious pets, keep it on a high shelf or in a hanging basket out of reach.
Plant Details Grid
- Mature Height: Vines can reach 6-10 feet indoors (longer if climbing)
- Mature Width: Spreads 2-3 feet if allowed to trail
- Sun Exposure: Bright, indirect light (tolerates low light but may lose variegation)
- Botanical Name: Epipremnum aureum ‘Marble Queen’
- Common Names: Marble Queen Pothos, Variegated Pothos
Why Choose ‘Marble Queen’ Over Other Pothos Varieties?
If you love pothos but want something with extra personality, ‘Marble Queen’ is the perfect choice. Its bold white-and-green marbling makes it more visually striking than the standard golden pothos, but it’s just as easy to care for. Unlike neon pothos, which has bright yellow-green leaves, or jade pothos, which is solid green, ‘Marble Queen’ offers a beautiful contrast that instantly brightens any space.
Whether you want an elegant trailing plant, an easy-care climbing vine, or a conversation-starting centerpiece, this variety delivers. It’s a pothos with just the right amount of drama—without the high maintenance.
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.7 ★★★★★
Based on 8 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 3
Only holds towels in place when it is full or 1/2 full
Color: 01-silver
If you are buying this for the feature of holding the paper towels in place so you can just rip one, I think you will be disappointed. Once the roll becomes smaller (and I tried changing the arm) the arm does not touch the towels. I do like the firm grip on the counter. My other dissatisfaction is the base gets water spots. Being near the sink this happens frequently. It does its job and is attractive.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 21, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Stylish
Color: 01-silver
Good sturdy stand for paper towels. Has small suction cups on bottom for stability. Good finish and good fit under the counter. Heavy base and not flimsy feeling. Brushed aluminum matched other appliances well.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 6, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Goodbye for the value
Color: 02-black
Great value looks wonderful very adorable
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 31, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Required Reading for Egyptologists
Format: Paperback
To say the very least, this book is an enlightening read. The author attempts to design a new chronology of Egypt based on a number of archaeological observations he made which pointed to certain anomolies in the standard chronology of the Third Intermediate Period of Egyptian history. The TIP is one of those points in history where information is scanty and there is much room for error in interpreting existing archaeological evidence. Rohl posits that the 21st and 22nd pharaonic dynasties were at least partly contemprary in a period of balkanization of Egypt, contrary to the conventional chronology's view that they were successive. He therefore shifts the entire preceding dynastic histories downward from 200 to 300 years. That is, what we previously though to occur at 1250 BC actually happened at 1000 BC according to Rohl. In so doing Rohl has done much to synchronize Egyptian chronology with the chronology of the bible.
Rohl claims that the Amarna letters were not to be compared to Joshua's conquest of Canaan, a period where they clearly do not fit, but rather tell the tale of Saul's and David's claiming of Israel from Phillistine Egyptian vassals. He synchonizes Ramesses II's conquests of Asia Minor with the biblical invasion of Shishak. Also, he identifies the Egyptian 'Hyksos' with the Amalekites of the book of Exodus. There are many other enlightening points of connection with the bible that Rohl makes, but my point here is not to explain them all.
The true value of this book for any egyptologist, student of biblical history, or any student of the ancient world at all, is this book's popular presentation of the field of archaeology and ancient history. So rare are books that actually connect a lay reader with the methodologies and evidence upon which researchers base their works. In order to show a need for a revision of Egyptian chronology, Rohl shows how the entirety of Egyptian chronology depends on all but of a handful of archaeological finds, many of them of dubious reliability. Even if Rohl's opponents find more pieces of evidence supporting the standard chronology, the number will still be very small and they will quite likely be as subject to interpretation, as are the ones that Rohl has pointed out. Rohl goes to great lengths to show the history of the observations that scholarship has made, thereby showing us where they may have gone wrong. (As a popular book, I must confess that parts of Rohl's historical narratives depict events in which one expects to find Indiana Jones) Next, when building his own chronology, Rohl puts us close to the texts and archaeological evidence upon which he bases his theories. Rohl's conclusions are in many cases impressive, but in some cases I had to shake my head and come to the conclusion that he was grasping at straws. For instance, I believe that his work in astronomical retrocalulations to find the dates of eclipses recorded in ancient texts is pretty shaky. I even doubt that the text that he is talking about is even mentioning an eclipse. This information has proved to be incredibly valuable to me, however, as I now know that astronomy based chronology, something I though would give absolute and undisputable dates, is as foggy an area of research as any.
I do not know if I will eventually embrace Rohl's ideas or not, or if partially. I do know that reading this book has shown me the types of reasoning and observations that old world historians make, and can now make an informed decision about how firm our grip on dating events of the past is. My conclusion: if somebody tells you some biblical event did not happen because the dates don't line up with scientific knowledge, don't be disheartened. We have a LONG way to go before we can truly be confident about such statements, if indeed we will ever arrive at that sort of knowledge. This uncertainty that I have gained from Rohl's book is corroberated by the "Oxford History of Ancient Egypt" which provides wonderful information on Egyptian chronology.
Everyone who wants to study ancient history, whether it be Egyptian, biblical, Middle Eastern, or even Chinese for that matter, should read this book, so the next time they read somewhere that 'such and such happened at 3200 BC', they will know to take that statement with a grain of salt. Whether Rohl is right or not, I am forever indebted to him for showing me how chronologists operate.
Lastly, I would like to say, after all this talk about archaeology and methodology of Egyptologists, that this book is very readable and comprehensible to the lay reader. Though a smattering of knowledge of biblical and/or Egyptian history will make the book more interesting to the reader, no such knowledge is required in order to understand the book or find value in it. It is truly a popular book intended for the average interested person. I recommend it to all.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 10, 2001
★★★★★ 5
Exciting reinterpretation of ancient history.
Format: Paperback
In "Pharoahs And Kings", author David Rohl offers the reader a stunning new interpretation of the events of the ancient world in Egypt and the Levant. In doing so, he ties in Biblical events to their proper place in history. This is a stunning reordering of events and personalities and brings both Egyptian and Biblical history to a much closer synchronization.
The book begins in Egypt where Rohl lays out his evidence for condensing the chronology of Egypt. Though we use AD/BC as a method of numbering our years, the ancients did not do so and used regnal dates ("In the third year of Pharoah So-And-So's reign, something happened."). By counting all Pharoahs and their reign lengths, historians felt they had a handle on when, according to our dating system, things happened. When they did so, they discovered the events portrayed in the Bible didn't match. When they date Solomon's reign in Israel to the Iron Age, for example, they find economic development to be poor - a far cry from the Biblical accounts of Solomon's reign as a flowering of culture and rich in trade. Likewise, Jericho's walls did not fall in the time period most historians would place the Exodus and entrance into the Levant of the Hebrews. Therefore, the Biblical accounts are simply myth, nothing more.
David Rohl is a historian, not a religious believer and his point of view is as a historian. His focus is to find a more accurate timeline for the events in the ancient Middle East. He begins in Egypt because that is his area of expertise and he gives convincing arguements for re-ordering the events of Egypt. The clincher, for me, was the tombs of Tanis (among other inconsistencies in the conventional dating such as the number of Apis Bulls) in which the tomb of Psusennes I cuts into the tomb of King Oskoron II and was obviously built after the tomb of Oskoron II. The problem? Oskoron II was from the 22nd dynasty while Psusennes was from the 21st! It is quite obviously reversed! Rohl's conclusion is that two dynasties were contemporary and that about 140 years needs to be removed from the timeline of Egypt.
When this is done, events in the Levant match the events in the Old Testament very closely. In the New Chronology, Jericho falls just when the Hebrews are entering Canaan according to the Bible. Solomon's Israel is now placed in the Late Bronze Age where there is evidence of prosperous cities and flourishing trade. There is evidence of mentions of both Saul and David in the Amarna Letters.
This was a page turner and Rohl's work, although controversial, is backed up by fact and evidence. There is less evidence for some of his conclusions than others (in my mind), but it is well researched and never strays from a scholarly interpretation of the evidence written and on the ground.
I actually enjoyed this book! David Rohl writes in a very engaging fashion, often using humor. His writing skill keeps subjects that may seem dull very frsh and exciting. He often uses humor and engages the reader, challenges the reader and forces the reader to think. This is not the usual dry tome on archeology that puts you to sleep! He assists the reader with many and high quality photos and drawings of the evidence and includes "side bars" with definitions and explanations in the margins to help the layman navigate the technical aspects of history and archeology without getting bogged down and overwhelmed.
This is a fine book and more than deserving of five stars. It's a very eye-opening and interesting read that doesn't seem like a college textbook. Instead, he challenges the reader while entertaining at the same time. I recommend this book with five stars!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on September 29, 2012