Pay in installments of $7.23 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 17 - Jul 22
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
travel.double.stroller UPPAbaby Vista V3 StrollerUPPAbaby Vista V3 Twin Stroller + 2 Mesa V3 Aria V2 Car Seats Travel System The Uppababy Vista V3 Twin Travel System provides the perfect solution for families with twin bundles of joy. This special UPPAbaby travel bundle provides everything a parent needs for strolling with two little passengers. It includes the incredibly versatile and newly upgraded Vista V3 stroller and your choice of either two (2) newly upgraded Mesa V3 infant car seats or two
UPPAbaby Vista V3 Twin Stroller + 2 Mesa V3/Aria V2 Car Seats Travel System
The Uppababy Vista V3 Twin Travel System provides the perfect solution for families with twin bundles of joy. This special UPPAbaby travel bundle provides everything a parent needs for strolling with two little passengers. It includes the incredibly versatile and newly upgraded Vista V3 stroller and your choice of either two (2) newly upgraded Mesa V3 infant car seats or two (2) of the super lightweight Aria V2 infant car seats, both stylish and full-featured options that provide you with a convenient and tasteful travel system. This particular travel bundle also includes the RumbleSeat which is designed for a second sibling, and the upper adapters which create additional spacing between the two seats so both children can ride comfortably.
What’s Included with this Travel System?
UPPAbaby VISTA V3 stroller including:
- UPPAbaby Vista V3 Stroller
- Toddler Seat Seasonal Seat Liner
- Toddler Seat Bug Shield
- Toddler Seat Rain Shield
- Stroller Storage Bag
- 3-Year UPPAbaby Warranty
Two (2) UPPAbaby Mesa V3 or Aria V2 Infant Car Seats including:
- Your choice of two (2) Infant Car Seats, either the Mesa V3 or the or Aria V2
- Two (2) Car Seat Bases
- Two (2) Two-Piece Robust Infant Inserts
- Limited Lifetime Warranty (up to expiration of car seat)
UPPAbaby RumbleSeat including:
- Lower Adapters
- Bumper Bar
- Bug Shield
- 3-Year UPPAbaby Warranty
UPPAbaby Upper Adapters
- Compatible with all Vista models after 2015.
- For use with all Bassinet models, Vista Toddler Seat, Mesa Infant Car Seats, and Aria Infant Car Seat
UPPAbaby Vista V3 Stroller:
One of the best just got better. Making improvements to arguably one of most popular and in-demand strollers on the market is no easy task, but UPPAbaby was up to the challenge. Introducing the UPPAbaby Vista V3, an upgraded version of the ever-popular Vista V2, designed for the growing family and loaded with new features and improvements.
UPPAbaby has kept everything customers loved about the predecessor Vista V2 stroller and introduced several upgrades and functional improvements that will make the Vista V3 a favorite with growing families for years to come.
UPPAbaby Vista V3 Key Features:
- Offering 30+ configurations to grow with your family starting from birth up to three children in tow
- The Vista V3 will no longer include the UPPAbaby bassinet with purchase. The UPPAbaby bassinet will continue to be offered as an accessory and can be added to the Vista V3 system.
- The Mesa and Aria Infant Car Seats as well as the Bassinet attach directly to the stroller with no adapters needed, creating an easy from-birth solution
- All-weather Comfort Seat with padded insert for cooler days will convert to mesh for warmer days
- Quick-to secure harness system with magnetic buckle and easy-to-adjust no rethread harness
- Enhanced FlexRide Suspension delivers a smooth ride on all types of terrain with either one, two or three little passengers
- Full size toddler seat grows with child up to 50 pounds and accommodates both the parent-facing or forward-facing positions
- Never flat tires for increased durability and smooth strolling on any type of terrain
- Reflective trims on wheels and basket provide increased visibility when strolling in low light or evenings
- Use of RumbleSeat and Piggyback board provides ability to transport up to three children
- Please note that the Piggback board is sold separately and not included in this listing.
- One-handed, multi-position recline allows for comfortable strolls and easy nap time
- Adjustable handlebar allows you to accommodate strollers of different heights with ease
- Front wheel locks with visual indicators for safety and extra piece of mind
- Adjustable footrest positions feet and legs comfortably as they grow
- Extendible UPF 50+ canopy
- Machine washable fabrics
- New all-terrain wheels available and sold separately (4-wheels, $150)
- GREENGUARD Gold Certified
- REACH Certified
- JPMA Certified
The Vista V3 is Available in a Variety of Stylish Options:
UPPAbaby is introducing several new colors to compliment their already impressive stable of fashions. With elegant frame options and several luxurious leather accents to choose from, the UPPAbaby V3 will make a sophisticated and stylish companion.
- OWEN: Mocha Mélange | Carbon Frame | Chestnut Leather
- ADA: Sandstone Mélange | Carbon Frame | Chestnut Leather
- JULIAN: Dusty Blue Mélange | Carbon Frame | Chestnut Leather
- EVELYN: Meadow Green | Graphite Frame | Chestnut Leather
- SAVANNAH: Pearl Gray Jacquard | Carbon Frame | Chestnut Leather
- KENZI: Mystic Aqua | Carbon Frame | Saddle Leather
- GREYSON: Charcoal Mélange | Carbon Frame | Saddle Leather
- JAKE: Charcoal | Carbon Frame | Black Leather
- CALLUM: Stone Blue |Silver Frame | Sand Leather
- NOA: Navy I Carbon Frame l Saddle Leather
UPPAbaby Vista RumbleSeat V3 Key Features:
- Suitable up to 40 lbs.
- Seasonal seat with breathable mesh backing for comfort in warmer climates
- Comfy insert for cooler days is easily removable without the use of tools
- Quick and easy magnetic closure buckle
- Easy one-handed release
- GREENGUARD® Gold Certified to support healthier air quality and low chemical emissions
- Multi-position adjustable footrest aids in child comfort for growing child
- Grow-with-me canopy height adjustment provides extra headspace for child
- Adapters ensure quick, easy, and intuitive attachment to Vista
- Can be positioned forward and parent-facing
- One handed, multi-position recline
- Extended zip out canopy provides even more shade from the sun. Mesh panels also make it easy to peek in while adding airflow.
- No-rethread harness allows the entire harness system to be tightened or loosened in a singular motion for a precise fit for growing babies
Choose The Car Seat That is Right For You:
Pair the versatile Vista V3 with one of UPPAbaby’s popular and adaptable infant car seats to create a travel system that delivers the ultimate in portability and safety. The key features for the UPPAbaby Mesa V3 and the Aria V2 Infant Car Seats are outlined below.
UPPAbaby Mesa V3 Key Features:
- 4th anti-rebound handle position for increased safety in rebound & rear-impact collisions
- Large, adjustable headrest for additional Side Impact Performance and comfortable fit
- Advanced Side Impact Protection that meets FMVSS New 213A regulation and 213B
- Deluxe, full coverage UPF 50+ canopy with mesh ventilation and peek-a-boo window
- Robust Infant Insert designed to optimize fit and body positioning
- No-rethread 5-point harness that adjusts with headrest
- Headrest totals 25 positions to ensure proper fit and ease of adjustment
- Intuitive, magnetic buckle holder to keep the straps out of the way while placing child in seat
- Installation quick and simple by combining our innovative SmartSecure® system, auto-retracting LATCH design, red to green tightness indicator, and four-position adjustable foot
- European Routing for a more secure installation when installing without the base
- Robust infant insert ensures a proper fit and body positioning for infants weighing as little as 4 lbs
- Ergonomic carry handle featuring a one-handed stroller release button
- Two crotch buckle positions for a precise fit
- Removable and washable seat fabric for convenience and easy clean up
- Fabric free from flame-retardant chemicals
- Carrier weighs under 10 lbs
- Car seat base included
- Direct attachment for Vista® and Cruz® strollers
- Convenient adapters available for the Minu® and Ridge® strollers
- FAA certified for aircraft use
- Product Lifetime Warranty
UPPAbaby Aria V2 Key Features:
- Lightest infant car seat on the market weighing in at just 6 lbs.
- Extra-large, UPF 50+ canopy with pop-out sunshade and ventilation for airflow
- Two-piece robust infant insert ensures proper fit and body positioning for preemies from approximately 4 lbs. with ability to fit babies up to 4 months
- SmartSecure® System with red-to-green visual indicator accurately installs in seconds
- Effortless no-rethread 5-point harness for a customized fit as baby grows
- Enhanced safety with Anti-Rebound+ Panel and Load Leg for increased stability and energy absorption
- GREENGUARD® Gold Certified to support healthier air quality and low chemical emissions
-
Direct attachment for Vista® and Cruz® strollers + convenient adapters for Minu® and Ridge®
Specifications:
Vista V3 stroller:
- Suitable from birth with accessories or 3 months to 50 lbs. without accessories
- Dimensions:
- Unfolded: 36” L x 25.7” W x 39.5” H
- Folded with seat attached: 17.3” L x25.7” W x 33.3” H
- Folded without Seat attached: 13” L 25.7” W x 32” H
- Product weight for seat and frame: 27 lbs.
- Product weight for frame only: 20 lbs.
- Product weight for seat only 7 lbs.
- Please note that the Piggback board is sold separately and not included in this listing.
Mesa V3 Infant Car Seat:
- Suitable from approximately 0–1 years
- Suitable from birth (4 lbs - 30 lbs and up to 32” in height) - whichever comes first
- Car Seat dimensions: 17”W x 25.8”L x 23”H
- Car Seat on base dimensions: 17”W x 28”L x 25”H
- Car Seat base-only dimensions: 14.5”W x 21.3”L x 10.3”H
- Car Seat 9.9 lbs
- Base 9 lbs
Aria V2 Infant Car Seat:
- Suitable from approximately 0–1 years
- Suitable from birth (4 lbs - 30 lbs and up to 30” in height) whichever comes first (US only)
- Carrier Weight: 6 lbs (without canopy and insert)
- Base Weight: 12.8 lbs
- Carrier Dimensions 25.8 L x 17 W x 23.7 H
- Base Dimensions 23.9” L x 14” W x 15.2” H
V3 RumbleSeat:
- Suitable for children from 3 months to 40 lbs or 36″, whichever comes first
- Suitable from birth with the SnugSeat Accessory
- Compatible with Vista 2015+ (including Vista V2 and Vista V3)
- Note: RumbleSeat V3 adapters are for use in the lower position only and are NOT compatible with the Vista Toddler Seat, which can only be used in the upper position.
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.3 ★★★★★
Based on 5 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
A fun and fulfilling book - would love to own the series
Format: Paperback
I had a lot of fun with this book. About a year ago, I really came down on the side of presuppositionalism and have studied the approach, see if it was useful against two of the leading atheistic books (God Is Not Great and The God Delusion), and now I wanted to match it up against four other views of apologetics. I will try to not go into too much detail here as I think the book is an important read for developing an apologetic standpoint.
The book follows the 1)"model of Approach X is presented" then 2) "Response from other 4 approaches to counter Approach X" and then move on to the next approach. The book allows final statements from each writer for a final opportunity. Steven Cowan has a good introduction and epilogue that bookends the book well.
Craig (Classical Approach) really surprised me as he brings in the role of the Holy Spirit early into the conversation. I really thought I was going to just be reading the finer points of the Kalam argument he's known for. The role of the Holy Spirit is reflected in the other authors' approaches as well and that was nice to see. It's also nice to see Craig debating with Christians for once and it's here that you really get to see his thought process contrasting with other people with the same worldview. There are issues that Craig tries to bring up against the presuppositionist view point that could be applied for him. He doesn't seem to get that all foundations are, by definition, circular because if you can appeal to something more foundational, then your foundation isn't your foundation at all. Craig seems to bring in some higher concepts about probability to make some of his points and I think that's really a miss for anyone who's not a high level philosopher (and even some philosophers might have issues understand what he's talking about here).
Habermas (Evidential Approach) seems to have an undue hatred for presuppositionalism. He's also another person who doesn't realize that the approach he uses isn't really the foundation he is starting from. I think he resents doing the hard work that the other approaches then build up to.
Feinberg (Cumulative Case Approach) seems to miss the point of presuppositionalism entirely. He's got the approach of what I call the "shotgun approach" in the sense that he wants to use everything possible and sees what he hits.
Frame (Presuppostional Approach) does an ok job with presenting the method. I don't think he would be my first choice in representing the approach. He doesn't do a good job of explaining the "problem of circularity" isn't a problem. He just does an "ok" job.
Clark (Reformed Epistemological Approach) is one I was excited to read. I liked some of his points he made when talking about the other approaches. Then I read his approach and was extremely disappointed. The biggest flaw is that he states literally that his approach doesn't help to show the Christian God is real. I would say then your apologetic method is worthless and not a real method at all. I understand the R.E. approach but if I went only with Clark's explanation and argumentation, I wouldn't have even considered it a real area of focus.
The book is well laid out, the footnotes are at the bottom of the pages (SO helpful!), Cowan does a good job of wrangling the writers and offering expanded reading and other authors for each area of focus.
Myself and my mentor spent from January to August every other week going over and discussing the book. Finding flaws, comparing and contrasting, and seeing where points were made and where points were missed. I think the biggest deficit we found was that the writers tended to assume agreement on definitions of words that played a big role (for example - the word "evidence" NEEDED to be defined right off the bat by every author and it wasn't until Frame in his response to the objections raised did we even have one person define it).
My suggestion for this book to maximize the fun is to pick a method and try and defend that method throughout; even with the writer arguing your side. My book is filled with notes and highlights that just made this book a great enjoyment to meet and discuss with a fellow Believer about. It does not settle all the issues, but it does help you focus on the fact that we still aren't done learning yet. Final Grade - A-
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 13, 2013
★★★★★ 4
Great Introduction to the Various Schools of Apologetics
Format: Paperback
In reading "Five Views on Apologetics", I first had to wonder why the book was called "Five Views" and not "Three Views", since the first three authors admittedly had so much in common with each other that it seemed that their positions were subcategories of a singular system of apologetics. In fact, Habermas claimed Craig as an evidentialist on multiple occasions and admitted they had relatively minor disagreements. Feinberg was also an evidentialist, but he differed from Habermas and Craig in supposing that any one argument could possibly be persuasive to a skeptic. All three individuals definitely agreed on so much though that their three essays proved to be slightly disappointing as in the end, I figured that any one of them practically utilized a combination of all three approaches (I've heard Craig make cumulative case presentations...). I wondered exactly why they were representing different apologetic camps.
Don't get me wrong: I like Craig and Hambermas and Feinberg; they're brothers in the Lord. I just find that evidentialism's off-shoots are so similar to each other that taking three chapters for the various forms of evidentialism didn't seem that worthwhile.
Ironically, it seemed that the other two views of were related by what seemed like a mutual distaste for the other, Frame wrote that he "was rather disappointed at Clark's treatment of the role of the Bible in determining apologetic principles" (310) and the suggestion that Clark might not have "tried hard enough to find out what the Bible says" (310) also seemed like a needless jab, but Frame still commended Clark on plenty and suggested that "presuppositionalists too are Reformed epistemologists" (312).
On the other hand, Clark wrote that Frame's essay is "the best version of presuppositionalism I have ever read" but then went on to suggest that presuppositionalism (at least as presented by Van Til) was either too confusing for him or was "obviously false" (255). Clark parroted the often repeated gross misunderstanding of presuppositionalism that "non-christians cannot know anything" (256), suggested that Frame implied this concept (257) and then spent several paragraphs refuting an obviously silly postulate; it's strange how Clark would insinuate that Frame would be so plainly stupid and I got the idea that Clark thought that all presuppositional apologists were somehow mentally lacking.
Even in my early reading of Van Til, I understood that he was writing about how unbelievers cannot account for how they know anything, not whether or not they can know anything. What was even more alarming was Clarks' confession that "anyone can find some support for his or her position in Scripture" (275), as if scripture lacks a clear meaning and is somehow malleable enough to consistently conform to anyone's presuppositions. I was left dissatisfied by how Clark didn't seem to exhibit reformed theology and I was also puzzled why Frame didn't present the Transcendental Argument for the Existence of God (the main positive argument of presuppositionalism). What was even more humerous was how Craig presented a fairly solid version of the transcendental argument and gave Frame a slight poke for not presenting the "main course" of presuppositionalism.
On the whole, I found "Five Views" to be reflective of much of my general feelings of the current state of apologetics; too distracted, too unscriptural, and too confusing. It was a difficult read at times; William Lane Craig's constant scampering into symbolic logic was frustrating and made me wonder whether the publisher clearly communicated the target audience to the authors.
I was disappointed that none of the authors attempted to establish any component of their case from scriptural exegesis but instead presented philosophical constructs aided by proof texts (i.e. Habermas referenced Romans 8:16 on page 97 as `proof' that the Holy Spirit may work through apologetics to bring "full assurance to believers", arguably not the meaning of Romans 8:16).
I also found myself wondering if the authors were agreeing on theological points due to lack of clarity (i.e. Craig's writing about the inner witness of the Holy Spirit was general enough that it sounded Mormon...). The book was good, and it DID expose me to five (arguably) different apologetic systems, but I hesitate to give it 5 stars due to some of the weak/unclear presentations of the systems and the thought that this isn't the best that evangelicalism has to offer.
It's still a worthwhile buy and I'm likely being too hard on it. I'd recommend it as an intro book for a college level Apologetics class, or for someone who's already familiar with theology and the concept of apologetics but isn't familiar with it in depth.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 4, 2009
★★★★★ 5
Great Contrasts
Format: Paperback
Cowan tells us, "This is a book about apologetics methodology, not a book of apologetics per se. That is, it is not a book that seeks to do apologetics as much as a book that discusses how one ought to do apologetics" (8).
Cowan has achieved the stated purposes of this book in many ways, but due to limited space I will stay focused on three examples; Glossary of Key Terms and Concepts, format, and conclusion by Cowan.
Glossary of Key Terms and Concepts (21-24) in this initial section of the book provide a clear and useful starting place for persons who are not academically familiar or comfortable with many terms used in the book. The fact that the key terms section included and defined conceptual terms supports the stated purpose of the book being a methodological rather than an apologetic book with multiple views from various writers' specific understandings and preferred styles of apologetics. As a new person to formal apologetics, this section helped launch me smoothly into the methodological discussions. I returned to these pages a few times to reacquaint myself with meaningful concepts.
The format of the discussion with proponents making a methodological case for their form of apologetic followed by critiques from supporters of other apologetic systems brought clarity to the five methods addressed in this book. This format help to highlight both strengths and weaknesses in methods. Cowan as the general editor achieved the goal of keeping the writers away from apologetics and on the goal of providing defense and critiques of these five methods. Each supporter had a unique "tee-up" to their sections. Craig starts by stating, "...methodology in Christian apologetics...raising the age-old issue of the relationship between faith and reason." He goes on further in his introduction to tell a story about his struggle at Wheaton College and why his methodology was helpful to his faith (26). Habermas clarifies that his form of evidential apologetics is, "...characterized as the one-step approach..." (92).This initial piece of information was insightful to me and a helpful clarification between classical and evidential methods. Feinberg on Cumulative Apologetics points out, "A good place to begin the discussion of apologetic methodology is to ask about the nature of the case for theism and Christianity" (148). Frame was probably the most direct in his initial statement by saying, "In apologetics, as in every aspect of the Christian life, the most important thing is to glorify God. Therefore, it is important for us to look in God's Word, the Bible, to see if our Lord gives us any directives relevant to the apologetic task" (208). In principle agree, but I will admit, I find his form of apologetics to be too circular in nature to be convincing to an unbelieving skeptic - as a standalone method. Christians I think would all say, well of course. Clark's section begins with stories meant to set the stage that it is reasonable have faith. Clark writes, "My suppose-this and suppose-that stories are intended to raise the problem of the relationship of our important beliefs to evidence" (267). Each of the five supporters of their method successfully introduced their unique method of apologetics.
Cowan regarding to his conclusions says, "Hopefully, this will not only help you, the reader, make your own decisions regarding apologetic methodology, but will also provide a basis for further discussion of the topic among scholars. Cowan's conclusions assured that main points of agreement and disagreement were clear. Here as with the other sections, the textual comments were method focused.
My criticism is pointed at the spirit of the debate. The writers did not draw enough contrasting between apologetic methods to clearly show that their individual method should be favored. I think the tone was a little too stilted in the direction of "playing" nice. In a book that purports to have five methods, there were times it seemed like only three or four methods. I guess this is inescapable give that each apologetic style can share some parts in common with another. Yet Craig shares my feeling here, I believe, based on his statement, "Pity our poor editor! Ideally he would like to find a wild-eyed fideist on one end of the spectrum and a hard-nosed theological rationalist on the other. Instead he winds up with a presuppositionalist who argues like an evidentialist..." (122).
Overall Five Views on Apologetics provides a good compare and contrast resource for anyone interested in these five common methods of apologetics.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 18, 2011
★★★★★ 5
Condense Analysis of 5 of the most notable Apologist
Format: Paperback
Looking for a quick reference guide to the major theorist of Apologic study, this book is a great resource.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 12, 2024
★★★★★ 5
Not an Intro to Apologetics
Format: Paperback
This book is not for the first-time student of apologetics. It's deep and, at times, difficult. However, for anyone with a serious interest in apologetics, this is a great way to find out which method suits your apologetic style and why. It was eye-opening for me.
I am confident that God can use most (if not all) of the five distinct methods covered in the book. But it was very helpful to me to consider pros and cons of each and decide which approach seemed appropriate for me.
Great book, if you feel ready for it!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on July 25, 2006