SKU: 39724748314
sedge killer herbicide

sedge killer herbicide Sedgehammer+ | Nutsedge Killer

Sale price$20.65 Regular price$22.94
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $5.74 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 9 - Aug 14

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

sedge killer herbicide Sedgehammer+ | Nutsedge KillerWhether you're a homeowner or business owner, keeping your turfgrass, lawn, ornamental plants, and shrubs looking beautiful is a priority. But when you're dealing with pesky sedges like purple and yellow nutsedge, it can be a real challenge. Nutsedge grows quickly, spreads easily, and can cause unsightly damage to your landscape. That's where Sedgehammer herbicide comes in. This Sedgehammer product eliminates nutsedge without harming your other

Whether you're a homeowner or business owner, keeping your turfgrass, lawn, ornamental plants, and shrubs looking beautiful is a priority. But when you're dealing with pesky sedges like purple and yellow nutsedge, it can be a real challenge. Nutsedge grows quickly, spreads easily, and can cause unsightly damage to your landscape. That's where Sedgehammer herbicide comes in. This Sedgehammer product eliminates nutsedge without harming your other plants.

A Selective Herbicide That Gets the Job Done

With its active ingredient Halosulfuron-methyl 5% concentration, this selective herbicide is perfect for post-emergence control of different types of sedges in established lawns, ornamental turfgrass, and landscaped areas. Sedgehammer herbicide is the proven herbicide for nutsedge control, trusted by professionals. Some of the top Sedgehammer include:

  • Controls yellow and purple nutsedge
  • Non-Ionic Surfactant no longer needed
  • Suppresses green Kyllinga and broadleaf weeds like horsetail
  • Low use rate 13.5 grams per 1,000 square feet
  • Moves through the plant, affecting the underground growing points (rhizomes and tubers)
  • It controls nutsedge after emergence in cool and warm-season turfgrass (including St. Augustinegrass, Bermudagrass, Kentucky bluegrass, tall and fine fescue, and perennial ryegrass)
  • Considered as one of the more “gentle to turfgrass” products
  • Pets and people can return to the treated area once the spray dries
  • Affordable and Easy to Use DIY Solutions

Affordable and Easy to Use DIY Solutions

You don't need to hire an expert to get rid of these weeds when we have DIY lawn and garden weed control solutions that work, are affordable, and are easy to use. Nutsedge killer is the perfect solution for your garden, lawn, turfgrass, and landscaping areas. Get this Sedgehammer product now and save up to 80% compared with exterminator costs.

How to Use Sedgehammer+

  • Open the packet and pour into 1 gallon of water.
  • Mix the solution thoroughly. One packet will cover 1,000 sq ft.
  • DO NOT add any non-ionic surfactant - it is already included in the packet for easy mixing.
  • While spraying, periodically swirl or shake the mixture to keep the product evenly distributed in the water.
  • Do not store the mixed solution as it will degrade and become ineffective within 24 hours of initiating the mix.

Learn More from Our DIY Experts

If you're looking for a reliable Nutsedge grass killer to take care of pesky sedges in your landscape or garden, look no further than Sedgehammer+. Our DIY Pest Warehouse experts are here to help you get the job done fast. Order your weed killer now and enjoy free, fast shipping in the U.S.

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 39724748314

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell sedge killer herbicide

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.5 ★★★★★
Based on 30 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
A
Verified Purchase
Adam C. Driver
Whiting, US
★★★★★ 5
Must read
Format: Paperback
Impressive second book by Justin Driver.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 1, 2025
J
Verified Purchase
james p. whitters III
Lake Worth, US
★★★★★ 5
Excellent!
Format: Paperback
Excellent read!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 5, 2025
B
Big Pumpkin
Draper, US
★★★★★ 1
A Disconnected and Legally Shaky Defense of Racial Preferences
Format: Paperback
While this book raises some thought-provoking points, it ultimately reads like a product of self-righteous elites disconnected from reality and from the American public. 1. Ignores public opinion. The author never acknowledges that polls consistently show Americans oppose racial preferences in college admissions. Proposition 16—which would have allowed such preferences—was defeated by a wide margin in 2020 in California, one of the nation’s most liberal states. A Brookings poll found that virtually all racial groups, including Black respondents, supported the Supreme Court’s Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) decision. 2. Starts with a strange premise. The first chapter claims conservatives will “regret” the SFFA ruling because universities will continue racial preferences covertly. But that sidesteps the real question: why shouldn’t colleges comply with the ruling’s letter and spirit? 3. Offers dubious legal advice. In Chapter Three, the author—himself a law professor—floats risky ideas for “working around” the Supreme Court’s decision. Many of these suggestions rest on shaky legal ground, as anyone familiar with the Second Circuit’s CACAGNY v. Adams, 116 F.4th 161 (2d Cir. 2024), would recognize. 4. Ignores proportionality and real-world outcomes. The book argues for “diversity” preferences without asking how much preference is justified. In reality, Asian American applicants face steep penalties. e.g. Stanley Zhong was rejected by five University of California campuses’ Computer Science programs as an in-state applicant—shortly before Google hired him for a full-time, Ph.D.-level software engineering position. Meanwhile, UC San Diego’s own freshman math-placement data show a surge of students—mostly “underrepresented minorities” favored by UC—placed into remedial courses, some testing at a 4th-grade level. It is hard to see how admitting these students is helping them other than allowing some elites to make themselves feel good or get a promotion. If this book represents what passes for legal scholarship at Yale, the state of American legal education should worry us all.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 12, 2025
J
Jason Galbraith
Belleville, US
★★★★★ 5
Adherence to the Rule of Law Must Not Become a Fair Weather Sport
Format: Paperback
The memorable quotation I have used for the title of this review comes from the second chapter (I think) of "The Fall of Affirmative Action." What is actually happening in the United States is that the law is being enforced rigorously against "enemy" institutions such as those of higher learning and not at all against those with power, money, or affinity for same. The author, an African-American Yale Law professor, devotes his first chapter to the ways in which conservatives might critique the SCOTUS precedent that ended affirmative action and his second to the ways in which liberals might critique it. His most invaluable contribution to the debate is that civil rights can be advocated from an anti-classification standpoint or an anti-subordination standpoint, with anti-subordinationists on both sides of the affirmative action debate. This forced me to take perhaps a harder look at my own beliefs than most books or articles about affirmative action. African-Americans are certainly subordinated in reality by being excluded from higher education but they are subordinated mostly in the minds of white Americans by the fact that a white applicant with the same scores, extracurriculars and admission essays might not get in. That at least is the conclusion I have come to. "Students for Fair Admissions," the organization that brought down affirmative action before SCOTUS, has now sued those few elite educational institutions that DIDN'T see sharp drops in their African-American enrollment. One strongly suspects that SFFA if not the "Justices" they persuaded will be happy only with a formal quota for African-Americans which is half or less their proportion in the population of the state where the institution is located.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 4, 2025
A
Amy Sullivan
Massapequa, US
★★★★★ 5
Provocative and fascinating read
Format: Paperback
Justin Driver's excellent book makes the case that conservatives may come to regret the Supreme Court's 2023 decision striking down affirmative action in college admissions. He argues that, rather than simply check a box to indicate their race, the decision will force non-white applicants to "perform their trauma" in application essays in ways that conservatives may find even more corrosive. And affluent non-white candidates--the people conservatives say should not be benefiting from affirmative action--will be the ones best-positioned to take advantage of the opportunity, since they are most equipped to exploit the loopholes and work-arounds that the Roberts decision created. A truly provocative read.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 1, 2025

recommand products