SKU: 6993328008
cactus and succulent potting soil mix

cactus and succulent potting soil mix Rosy Soil Cactus & Succulent Mix, 4 qt

Sale price$24.55 Regular price$27.28
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $6.82 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 3 - Aug 8

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

cactus and succulent potting soil mix Rosy Soil Cactus & Succulent Mix, 4 qtRosy Soil Cactus & Succulent Mix is a fast draining, chunky mix made using eco friendly, high quality ingredients. It is free of peat and synthetics, and every bag is carbon and plastic neutral. In fact, Rosy's entire supply chain has a net neutral carbon footprint! Feel great about using this sustainable, peat free soil to naturally support healthy plant growth. NUTRIENT DENSE: Boosts soil aeration, drainage, and nutrient uptake to help drought

Rosy Soil Cactus & Succulent Mix is a fast-draining, chunky mix made using eco-friendly, high-quality ingredients. It is free of peat and synthetics, and every bag is carbon- and plastic-neutral. In fact, Rosy's entire supply chain has a net neutral carbon footprint! Feel great about using this sustainable, peat-free soil to naturally support healthy plant growth.

NUTRIENT DENSE: Boosts soil aeration, drainage, and nutrient uptake to help drought-tolerant flourish
RESEALABLE: Plant-based packaging in convenient sizes for cactus and succulent parents
SUSTAINABLE: Made from eco-friendly, high-quality ingredients (biochar, pumice, compost, mycorrhizae, pine bark fines, sand) and is free from peat & synthetic additives.
LIVING SOIL: Fortified with beneficial fungi & microbes to help promote healthy root development and lush foliage
MISSION-DRIVEN: Our carbon-neutral blend helps fight climate change and is perfect for all types of cacti and succulents

Ingredients:
Biochar is a horticultural charcoal that holds onto oxygen and nutrients while also storing microbes and carbon in the soil.
Pumice is a naturally occurring volcanic rock that is lightweight and porous, helping to improve soil drainage and aeration.
Mycorrhizae are beneficial microorganisms that form a symbiotic relationship with plant roots, allowing the plants to absorb more nutrients.
Sand has large grain size, coarse texture, and high silica content to support soil drainage.
Pine Bark Fines are a byproduct of the mulch industry which enhance soil structure and improve aeration.
Compost helps reduce waste in landfills by turning green waste and wood waste into a useful source of nutrients for plants.

Soil Specifications:
Guaranteed Analysis 0.56-0.17-0.29
(Derived from green compost and wood waste compost)

ALSO CONTAINS NON-PLANT FOOD INGREDIENTS

Soil Amending Guaranteed Analysis
Active Ingredients:
Rhizophagus irregularis.........2.3 propagules/cm3
Funneliformis mosseae..........2.1 propagules/cm3
15% Biochar derived from pine wood

Inert Ingredients:
85% Total Other Ingredients (inert as non-plant food ingredients)

*Biochar reduces soil density and increases soil aeration.
*Mycorrhizae may promote root mass expansion and nutrient efficiency.
Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 6993328008

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell cactus and succulent potting soil mix

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.4 ★★★★★
Based on 29 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
J
Verified Purchase
james p. whitters III
San Leandro, US
★★★★★ 5
Excellent!
Format: Paperback
Excellent read!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 5, 2025
B
Big Pumpkin
Birmingham, US
★★★★★ 1
A Disconnected and Legally Shaky Defense of Racial Preferences
Format: Paperback
While this book raises some thought-provoking points, it ultimately reads like a product of self-righteous elites disconnected from reality and from the American public. 1. Ignores public opinion. The author never acknowledges that polls consistently show Americans oppose racial preferences in college admissions. Proposition 16—which would have allowed such preferences—was defeated by a wide margin in 2020 in California, one of the nation’s most liberal states. A Brookings poll found that virtually all racial groups, including Black respondents, supported the Supreme Court’s Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) decision. 2. Starts with a strange premise. The first chapter claims conservatives will “regret” the SFFA ruling because universities will continue racial preferences covertly. But that sidesteps the real question: why shouldn’t colleges comply with the ruling’s letter and spirit? 3. Offers dubious legal advice. In Chapter Three, the author—himself a law professor—floats risky ideas for “working around” the Supreme Court’s decision. Many of these suggestions rest on shaky legal ground, as anyone familiar with the Second Circuit’s CACAGNY v. Adams, 116 F.4th 161 (2d Cir. 2024), would recognize. 4. Ignores proportionality and real-world outcomes. The book argues for “diversity” preferences without asking how much preference is justified. In reality, Asian American applicants face steep penalties. e.g. Stanley Zhong was rejected by five University of California campuses’ Computer Science programs as an in-state applicant—shortly before Google hired him for a full-time, Ph.D.-level software engineering position. Meanwhile, UC San Diego’s own freshman math-placement data show a surge of students—mostly “underrepresented minorities” favored by UC—placed into remedial courses, some testing at a 4th-grade level. It is hard to see how admitting these students is helping them other than allowing some elites to make themselves feel good or get a promotion. If this book represents what passes for legal scholarship at Yale, the state of American legal education should worry us all.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 12, 2025
J
Jason Galbraith
Chelsea, US
★★★★★ 5
Adherence to the Rule of Law Must Not Become a Fair Weather Sport
Format: Paperback
The memorable quotation I have used for the title of this review comes from the second chapter (I think) of "The Fall of Affirmative Action." What is actually happening in the United States is that the law is being enforced rigorously against "enemy" institutions such as those of higher learning and not at all against those with power, money, or affinity for same. The author, an African-American Yale Law professor, devotes his first chapter to the ways in which conservatives might critique the SCOTUS precedent that ended affirmative action and his second to the ways in which liberals might critique it. His most invaluable contribution to the debate is that civil rights can be advocated from an anti-classification standpoint or an anti-subordination standpoint, with anti-subordinationists on both sides of the affirmative action debate. This forced me to take perhaps a harder look at my own beliefs than most books or articles about affirmative action. African-Americans are certainly subordinated in reality by being excluded from higher education but they are subordinated mostly in the minds of white Americans by the fact that a white applicant with the same scores, extracurriculars and admission essays might not get in. That at least is the conclusion I have come to. "Students for Fair Admissions," the organization that brought down affirmative action before SCOTUS, has now sued those few elite educational institutions that DIDN'T see sharp drops in their African-American enrollment. One strongly suspects that SFFA if not the "Justices" they persuaded will be happy only with a formal quota for African-Americans which is half or less their proportion in the population of the state where the institution is located.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 4, 2025
A
Amy Sullivan
Lake Worth, US
★★★★★ 5
Provocative and fascinating read
Format: Paperback
Justin Driver's excellent book makes the case that conservatives may come to regret the Supreme Court's 2023 decision striking down affirmative action in college admissions. He argues that, rather than simply check a box to indicate their race, the decision will force non-white applicants to "perform their trauma" in application essays in ways that conservatives may find even more corrosive. And affluent non-white candidates--the people conservatives say should not be benefiting from affirmative action--will be the ones best-positioned to take advantage of the opportunity, since they are most equipped to exploit the loopholes and work-arounds that the Roberts decision created. A truly provocative read.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 1, 2025
K
Kindle Customer
Phoenix, US
★★★★★ 5
A Powerful and Timely Book about Fairness and Equality in America
Format: Kindle
This book is beautifully written and deeply engaging. As a non-lawyer, I appreciated the author's ability to cut through legal abstraction to reveal what is truly at stake as the Supreme Court turns away from policies designed to expand opportunity. Driver writes, with clarity and conviction, that genuine equality demands more than the pretense that race no longer matters. The result is a powerful and thought-provoking work that reminds us the pursuit of fairness in America remains unfinished.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 5, 2025

recommand products