Size:
4
Pay in installments of $5.76 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 28 - Aug 2
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
y2k dress Y2K Silk Ruffle Maxi Dress – The Vintage TwinDetails 1 of 1 vintage Y2K dress Slight distressing on left side on front. Asymmetric hem 2000s 100% Polyester inner, 100% Silk Original label: Jonathan Martin This garment has been professionally cleaned Our The Vintage Twin brand tag has been sewn inside. We do not remove any original tags. Size + Fit This was originally designed as a womens item and has a traditional womens size. chest: 36 in length: 51 in Original designer size: 10 Delivery +
- 1 of 1 vintage Y2K dress
- Slight distressing on left side on front.
- Asymmetric hem
- 2000s
- 100% Polyester inner, 100% Silk
- Original label: Jonathan Martin
- This garment has been professionally cleaned
- Our The Vintage Twin brand tag has been sewn inside. We do not remove any original tags.
- This was originally designed as a women’s item and has a traditional women’s size.
- chest: 36 in
- length: 51 in
- Original designer size: 10
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.8 ★★★★★
Based on 25 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 4
Gentle and effective
I've been using these pads a loooong time. They take off everything and are not irritating at all (my skin is super sensitive).
However they WILL leave an oily residue on your skin causing your makeup to spread around your face a bit. I don't mind this since I'd rather be over moisturized than dry. Nothing a little Cetaphil can't conquer post eye makeup removal.
I've since switched to Bioderma Crealine which lives up to all the hype. It takes ALL my makeup off without leaving any residue. I still use the EyeQ pads for heavy duty mascara and traveling since they are compact and cut down on the amount of stuff I need to carry.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on September 26, 2013
★★★★★ 3
A Little Too Oily
These little pads work great in removing eye makeup after cleansing your face, but they leave an oily residue on your eyelids. I found that wiping with a cold wet cotton ball removes the excess oil from my eyelids but is necessary. I saw these in an advertisement for youthful looking skin, but I have not seen these results from the short period of using them.
I will add they are soft on the eyelid and not scratchy and easy to use. Give them a try.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on July 23, 2024
★★★★★ 5
Will be my go-to
As good as my almay brand, but at a better cost point. Also removes waterproof mascara without eye irritation.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 27, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Gentle, refreshing, and doesn’t dry my skin out!
Size: 8 Fl Oz (Pack of 1)
It’s great for everyday use, especially if you have sensitive or dry skin. The texture is smooth, it rinses off easily, and the scent is light and pleasant. I’ve noticed my skin looks clearer and more even since I started using it.
Definitely a great option if you want something simple, gentle, and effective for daily cleansing!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 18, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Gentle, Balanced & reasonably priced! Worth it!
Size: 8 Fl Oz (Pack of 1)
I’d recommend this cleanser if you’re looking for a gentle, everyday face wash that balances hydration with cleansing.works well with my combination skin.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 3, 2026