white two piece vintage dress Vintage 1940s Open Back Deep V White Lace Nightgown Dress – Second Sight  Vintage
SKU: 4020766193
white two piece vintage dress

white two piece vintage dress Vintage 1940s Open Back Deep V White Lace Nightgown Dress – Second Sight Vintage

Sale price$19.71 Regular price$21.90
Save 10%
Size: 4

Pay in installments of $5.47 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 2 - Jul 7

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

white two piece vintage dress Vintage 1940s Open Back Deep V White Lace Nightgown Dress – Second Sight VintageVintage 1930s 1940s Romantic Cut out Back Nightgown DressDate: 1940'sFits like: Probably best for size medium but fits well on a small. This garment isn't intended to be tight in any spot and drapes to fit. It has no closures so must be able to be pulled on over the head. Shown unpinned on a size 6 model. Color: White with cream laceFabric: Rayon crepe with cotton lace trim. Label: Alida, the richy clad. Size 38. Features: This romantic dress is

Vintage 1930s 1940s Romantic Cut-out Back Nightgown Dress

Date: 1940's
Fits like: Probably best for size medium but fits well on a small. This garment isn't intended to be tight in any spot and drapes to fit. It has no closures so must be able to be pulled on over the head. Shown unpinned on a size 6 model.
Color: White with cream lace
Fabric: Rayon crepe with cotton lace trim.
Label: Alida, the richy clad. Size 38.

Features: This romantic dress is constructed of a semi-sheer, light crepe fabric with a wonderful drape. It has a deep V shaped open back that goes most of the way down to the waist. It was worn here with a slip but I think it would be lovely with a skirt slip and a cute bralette. The fabric in front is gathered at the bodice, which gives the area a delicate and feminine look.  This dress has long sleeves and a full, midi length skirt. While this was originally intended to be a nightgown I think it would be lovely worn out as a dress. 

Condition: In very good vintage condition. It is clean with no holes or stains to note.

Measurements:

Bust: up to 41 inches
Waist: up to 32 inches
Length: 50 inches
Sleeve Length: 24 inches
Shoulder to Waist: 17 inches
Armscye: 23 inches


If you have any questions or would like additional pictures, please feel free to send me a message and I'll be happy to help.

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 4020766193

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell white two piece vintage dress

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.3 ★★★★★
Based on 647 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
H
Verified Purchase
Heeia
Alexandria, US
★★★★★ 5
Good looking shoe.
Size: 9 Wide, Color: Cognac
It's a good looking should which is true to size. Quality is good. However, it is not leather. Inner and outer covering are man made. For me, it's okay. I ordered a 9W which I knew would be no more than a triple E width. I'm actually a quadruple E width so it's taking a little longer to break in. I won't be using these as often as at this stage of my life, I don't have that have functions that require dressier shoes. I'm happy with this purchase, a good value for the price. The slip in feature works well like my Sketcher slip in.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on July 27, 2025
E
Verified Purchase
Ed
Los Angeles, US
★★★★★ 5
Good shoes
Size: 8.5 Wide, Color: Cognac
Great shoes and very comfortable. Not very durable in my opinion. Good for dress or casual.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 27, 2026
S
Verified Purchase
SirTW
Whiting, US
★★★★★ 5
Sleek, upscale and supremely comfortable
Size: 9, Color: Cognac
I did not know that Marc Joseph makes hands free slip ins. I own four pair of Skechers, and I thought they were the only game in town. I decided that I wanted a pair of business casual pair of wingtips. I already own two pair of Skechers Mark Nason wingtips in blue and black nubuck, so I bought a pair of their cognac colored. Perfectly fine shoes, but when they arrived, I didn't like the color, so the search was on! I found these cognac-colored Mark Joseph's and hands down, they fit the bill for what I was looking for! I actually bought two more pair of Skechers in the brown family in the same oxford, elastic lace style: One pair of another style of their Mark Nason line and one pair of their Garza line. So now I am comparing three pair of Skechers to the Marc Joseph's. Obsessive, I know :). Luckily, I have a Skechers store near me for easy returns. The look I was going for is a sleek, business casual that I could dress up or down. Three things that I love about the Marc Joseph's are the beautiful cognac finish: the white yet lower profile soles and the more formal, narrower toe style. The MJ's nailed it with the color. They have a slightly darker, more lustrous and glossier look than the others. The color alone looks classier and pairs well with black pants which I wear for work almost every day. The white soles are exactly what I was looking for. The visible rise is probably about a third of the thickness of the others and are a much more subtle, classier look. They offset the cognac color nicely but are not that in your face, sneaker looking, thick white sole. When I was comparing them to the others right out of the box, I thought they would be too narrow and tight because they looked sleeker and narrower than the others. But they fit perfectly and were very comfortable right out of the box. Upon closer inspection and comparison, I realized the narrower, sleeker look is because the eyelets for the elastic shoelaces are closer together that give the illusion that the shoe is narrower. They compensate for what might create a tighter fit across the top of your foot with two stretchy "gores" they are called on either side of the upper part. The "slits" are nicely finished, and you can't see the stretchy part and add a nice design touch to the shoe. But between them and the elastic shoelaces, they must stretch just enough to make them extremely comfortable across the top. So, if you have a high instep/arch, they should accommodate it nicely. Last but not least, they are very comfortable shoes. I wear a size 8 1/2 to 9 and my foot is slightly on the wide side. I bought the size 9's and they fit perfectly. If you are between sizes or have wider feet, you may want to size up a half size. Because the Skechers have much thicker soles, they might be slightly more cushioned, but the MJ's are cushioned more than enough for my purposes and very comfortable. Plus, they actually just feel better on my feet. I can't speak to how durable they will be as I just got them, but so far, so good. So, there you have it. I rely on other people's reviews a lot when buying online, and especially for shoes. I know it's always a crap shoot, particularly when buying shoes online, so I hope this review helps. Everybody's feet are different, but I highly recommend these.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 15, 2025
B
Verified Purchase
Ben
Bozeman, US
★★★★★ 5
Comfortable and look great!
Size: 10.5, Color: Cognac
Very comfortable, look nice, and slip on easily.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 4, 2026
J
Verified Purchase
jacqueline cosey
Bozeman, US
★★★★★ 5
Great buy
Size: 8.5 Wide, Color: Cognac
True to size. Love the style and feels amazing on your feet... Great item to buy!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 26, 2026

recommand products